| |
Metro Wastewater
JPA News:
Our news releases
General News:
Other water-related news
Monthly News
Briefs
from JPA:
Our monthly newsletters
|
Higher water, sewer bills possible
Sanders to unveil proposed rate hike
By Matthew T. Hall and Mike Lee
STAFF WRITERS - San Diego Union Tribune
November 21, 2006
Mayor Jerry Sanders will tie his reputation today to water and
sewer rate increases that would boost the average San Diego homeowner's
bill about 35 percent between now and 2011 to pay for a spate
of construction projects.
Ten months after calling an increase inevitable, Sanders will
propose raising monthly rates in a press conference today. The
typical single-family household bill would go from the current
$78.30 to $105.53. The money is for upgrades to aging water and
sewer systems that are subject to sanctions because of repeated
breakdowns, the mayor said.
Residents and businesses are included in the latest proposal, which
the City Council is scheduled to take up early next year. They
have endured a similar round of rate increases in recent years,
and the rates are likely to go up far past 2011.
“What the hell is an individual going to do about it? Not a hell of a
lot. You try to conserve water,” said retired aerospace worker
Andrew Manzi, who has lived in Clairemont for decades.
At City Hall, Sanders and City Attorney Michael Aguirre said the
public will understand the necessity.
“If we want to continue to have a supply of clean water, we need to pay,” said
Sanders, whose staff has discussed the rate proposal with various
community leaders.
San Diego can allow its infrastructure “to disintegrate
and have a major health crisis in our city, or we go to the people,
we tell them the truth . . . and we make the changes necessary,” Aguirre
said.
Despite early concerns about the proposal, Council President Scott
Peters said the increase is “probably something we'll have
to do.”
“There will be a lot of questions about the magnitude of these hikes,
but no question really about the need to do the work,” he said.
The rate proposal is based on some $1.4 billion in capital projects
and debt payments from fiscal 2008 to 2011. Those efforts largely
are designed to meet court and regulatory mandates aimed at restoring
San Diego's long-neglected pumps and pipes.
The city is also considering a $1 billion upgrade of its Point
Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant. The project is not included in
the rate projections.
The customer base is made up mostly of single-family water and
sewer users, with smaller numbers of multifamily, commercial and
industrial clients. About 220,000 of the 273,000 customers in each
system are single-family ratepayers.
Under the proposal, San Diego's water department would increase
its revenues by 6.5 percent a year for four years, starting July
1. The city would charge users a smaller base fee along with a
larger fee for water use to even out billing inequities and promote
conservation.
The projections for sewer budgets are more complex. The wastewater
department's revenues would increase 11.8 percent May 1 and then
rise by 11.8 percent, 7.6 percent and 7.5 percent in each of the
ensuing years.
Many single-family ratepayers would get a sewer rebate if the city
settles a lawsuit over the way those customers subsidized businesses
for a decade. The net effect is that homeowners would pay about
8.75 percent for two years, followed by roughly 7 percent increases
the next two years.
The city plans to use the additional revenue to borrow even more
money to cover a range of projects, many of them government-mandated,
to upgrade everything from pipes to pump stations to treatment
plants.
The rate proposal is generating considerable scrutiny in cash-strapped
San Diego due to a history of management miscues in the utility
departments. Key concerns include whether the revenues from prior
rate increases were spent appropriately and whether enough oversight
measures are in place.
Craig Benedetto leads the infrastructure committee for the San
Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce and is a lobbyist for the San
Diego Building Owners and Managers Association. He said his clients
are not pleased about the cost, “but if it's needed and the
projects are completed, they are resigned to go along with it.”
Benedetto met with the mayor's staff yesterday to preview the rate
case, but he remained unsure that the money from previous rate
boosts was well-spent. Sanders' assistants are touting a financial
review by an outside accounting firm, but that analysis stopped
short of being an actual audit.
“Unless you have an audit, you don't know,” Benedetto said.
Around the region, utility managers are dealing with steep increases
in construction costs increases. Four percent to 7 percent annual
increases are common for water and sewer utilities.
In Chula Vista, for example, sewer bills are growing by about 7.5
percent a year. The fast-growing city's main water supplier is
the Otay Water District, where officials anticipate a 5.4 percent
increase next year.
In San Diego, council members already are tinkering with how the
city runs its utilities.
Last week, the city's Natural Resources and Culture Committee voted
unanimously to return to billing customers for water and sewer
every other month. The proposal now heads to the full council.
At the urging of former Mayor Dick Murphy, the city switched to
monthly bills in 2003. The idea was to make it easier for residents
to budget after the last round of rate increases.
The project ended up costing the city more than $500,000 a year
for additional paper, postage and other expenses, said Councilwoman
Donna Frye, chairwoman of the resources committee. She also complained
about billing errors in the new system.
“Before ratepayers are asked to consider any rate increases, we must
first do everything we can to reduce costs and ensure the accuracy of the billing
statements,” Frye said.
|